I totally agree on not ACKing the patch and your solution description
;-) I tried to start a discussion on IRC about the preferred solution
before sending this patch, but that didn't get very far.

Op 17 februari 2012 22:58 heeft Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> het
volgende geschreven:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:04:50PM +0100, Frank de Brabander wrote:
>> This causes compiler warnings when using Clang instead of default GCC.
>
> I'm not particularily interested in source code fixes "just to silence
> a compiler warning" - but Clang is right, of course, that this variable
> cannot ever be negative, and thus it should be cleaned up :-)
>
> I'm not ACKing this patch anyway, because I think the issue is bigger - I
> want to look at the IPv4 code paths and see whether the IPv4 "netbits"
> structure element can ever be negative - and if yes, figure out whether
> this should be possible for IPv6, and if not, convert the IPv4 netbits
> to "unsigned int" as well, and get rid of the if() statement there as
> well.
>
> Thanks for reporting this.  I'll look into it.
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Reply via email to