Hi,
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:08:31AM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> >> I'm having a problem with feat_ipv6_payload branch (checked out from git
> >> yesterday). One end is Solaris 10 (sparc) and the other end is Linux.
> > Which version of the tun driver are you using for Solaris?
> >
> > My test solaris machine (Solaris 10 on Sparc64, but not the very latest
> > version) uses the driver from http://www.whiteboard.ne.jp/~admin2/tuntap/
> > and IPv6 works fine there. The web page says that this driver did not
> > support IPv6 before 11/16/2009 - so maybe this is the problem.
> That was it! Works now:
>
> [Linux] ~ # ping6 -n 2001:cafe::1
> PING 2001:cafe::1(2001:cafe::1) 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 2001:cafe::1: icmp_seq=343 ttl=255 time=54.3 ms
> 64 bytes from 2001:cafe::1: icmp_seq=344 ttl=255 time=50.1 ms
> ^C
Cool :-) - congratulations!
(And thanks for testing point-to-point tun mode - I assumed it would
work, but it's still on my test-plan...)
> I used to have CSWtun from Blastwave - it's labeled as version 1.1 as
> well so I believed it was the right thing.
Hmmm. I wasn't aware that that one exists - but it might be worth a try
to send them a note that they might want to do some updates.
> Is there any way to check that the right module is loaded at runtime?
> That may help avoid some confusion in the future...
Good questions. I don't know right now, but I'll try to find out.
> (BTW is there any work in progress for a v6 transport?)
Well, there's feat_ipv6_transport by jjo, and of course, the "allmerged"
branch which has both v6 payload and v6 transport. As far as I understand,
the v6 transport stuff works on all "major" platforms supported by
OpenVPN and generally gets the job done :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
