On 04/27/2010 05:58:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> > IMO OpenVPN is encouraging bad practices by supplying packages for
> > distros that include OpenVPN.
> 
> Ideally the package for that distro as made by OpenVPN is always
> equivalent to the one made by the distributor.

I'm writing again in case someone thinks this is a reason why it's
fine for an end-user to get their OpenVPN from openvpn.net.

The problem is not the initial package installation.  It's
keeping up with changes over time.  That's the big
service that distro's provide.  Installing a single non-distro
application is no big deal.  More than a few become a problem
to keep up with to the point where eventually things stop
working.  Packages makes it easier to keep track of what's
what and keep things updated, in comparison to ./configure;
make; make install, but the point of diminishing returns
is soon reached regardless.

Karl <k...@meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                 -- Robert A. Heinlein


Reply via email to