On 04/21/2010 10:49 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: >> Have you considered a local caching DNS with forwarding? > > I don't see how this will solve the problem. > What if the closest _is_ a local caching DNS with forwarding > to the next farthest out? You still want all the DNS servers > available in case one is down for some reason.
Correct, and since NetworkManager adds them in the order the server gives them, having the two methods (native vs NM) operate differently is confusing and troublesome. I decided that the server order should be followed by all clients. -- Richard Monk (rm...@redhat.com) - Security Analyst Red Hat - Centennial Office: Raleigh, NC USA +1 (919) 890 8501 GPG Key ID: 0x1EBEF129
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
