Hi,
That's a very good suggestion! I just tried this with OpenVPN-ALS (adito), and while the average performance is slightly lower (java vs. compiled code?), the throughput inconsistency is not there, rather it's only the case with OpenVPN! Attached another throughput plot for you. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 03:17 PM, Stefan Monnier <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: > > because i really believe in open source software I've decided to check > > all sorts of configurations to check problems with tcp tunneling. > > This makes it sound like OpenVPN's performance is lower than some > comparable non-Free software. > Have you actually compared OpenVPN's performance to some other > TCP-tunnel solution? That would be instructive since it may point to > ways to improve the TCP support. > > I know in general OpenVPN discourages the use of TCP tunnels and for > good reasons, but the support for TCP tunnels is also one of the > strengths of OpenVPN, making it usable even with the most > uncooperative firewalls. > > > Stefan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-devel mailing list > Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel >
OpenVPN-ALS.png
Description: Binary data
