Transmit Report:
iry...@nexg.net¿¡°Ô ¸ÞÀÏ ¹ß¼ÛÀ» 3¹ø ½ÃµµÇßÁö¸¸ ½ÇÆÐÇÏ¿´½À´Ï´Ù.
(½ÇÆÐ ÀÌÀ¯ : 550 <iry...@nexg.net>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
local recipient table(211.232.190.7))
<Âü°í> ½ÇÆÐ ÀÌÀ¯¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼³¸í
User unknown :¸ÞÀÏÀ» ¼ö½ÅÇÒ »ç¿ëÀÚ°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ½
Socket connect fail:¼ö½Å ¸ÞÀÏ ¼¹ö¿Í ¿¬°á ½ÇÆÐ
DATA write fail :¼ö½Å ¸ÞÀÏ ¼¹ö·Î ¸Þ¼¼Áö ¼Û½Å ½ÇÆÐ
DATA reponse fail :¼ö½Å ¸ÞÀÏ ¼¹ö·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸Þ¼¼Áö ¼ö½Å ½ÇÆÐ
Reporting-MTA: dns; nexg.net
Final-Recipient: rfc822;iryna7@nexg.net
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;
550 error - <iryna7@nexg.net>: Recipient address rejected:
User unknown in local recipient table(211.232.190.7)
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 08:40:50 -0500
Charles Duffy <cdu...@spamcop.net> wrote:
> OpenVPN 2.1-beta3 merged a patch adding multihoming support.
Just a question: I have an openvpn-2.0.7 server (compiled from source)
in a production environment. Is 2.1beta4 stable enough to replace 2.0.7?
R.
--
___________________________________________________________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak
aloud and remove all doubt.
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht |
| Public key and email address: |
| http://www.lucassen.org/mail-pubkey.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
--- End Message ---
