On Thu, 18 May 2006 23:49:16 +0400, Charles Duffy <cdu...@spamcop.net>
wrote:
Why not just have separate config files for each possible configuration,
rather than stuffing several configurations in one file?
I did not know if it is possible on the client.
The configurations could be set to exit on failure, and a wrapper script
(supervised by runit or a similar tool) could be responsible for
rotating between them.
The idea is based on what I see in the openssl configuration file
regarding the certificate generation of different types ("client" vs
"server"), for example.
Tony.
