I believe, with the help of CFI in #openvas, that the issue is because of the 
QoD.  The hits found in the GCE are showing a QoD of 75% but if we look it up 
on secinfo.greenbone.net, it shows a QoD of 30%.  Is there a reason that the 
GCE would have a different QoD than OpenVAS or what the website would show?  
Here are some links that may help:

https://ibb.co/e4bEex shows the difference between my scans with OpenVAS on the 
left and the GCE on the right.  
Notice how the "OpenSSH Multiple Vulnerabilities has a QoD of 75%?  
https://secinfo.greenbone.net/omp?token=guest&cmd=get_info&info_type=nvt&filter=1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.806052
 shows it to only be 30%.  
Same thing with "OpenSSH Denial of Service and User Enumeration Vulnerabilities 
(Linux)".  75% in the scan and only 30% at the web site:  
https://secinfo.greenbone.net/omp?token=63c528c2-3c1b-11e8-9dba-0050568d6d9a&cmd=get_info&info_type=nvt&filter=1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.809154
 

Why would my GCE have a difference QoD for some of these results than what 
shows on the website?

Stewart Joseph
LEK Technology Consultants
407-877-6505 x1103
www.lekcomp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Openvas-discuss <openvas-discuss-boun...@wald.intevation.org> On Behalf 
Of Stewart Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 11:30 AM
To: Jan-Oliver Wagner <jan-oliver.wag...@greenbone.net>; 
openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Trying to decide the right install

Thank you.  When doing the install, the first time I run 
greenbone-scapdata-sync I get many
"Error: near line xxxxx: database is locked" and "Error: near line xxxxx: NOT 
NULL constraint failed: affected_products.cve"
errors that show.  

The scripts greenbone-nvt-sync and greenbone-certdata-sync both work fine.

If I run any of those 3 again they grab the incremental file list and stops.  I 
assume that is normal?  SecInfo Dashboard shows NVTs at 53792, CVEs at 103690, 
and CERT-Bund at 8739.  

Could this be why I get so few results?  How can I tell if there is a problem 
with my downloaded feeds?

Stewart Joseph, CTO
LEK Technology Consultants
407-877-6505 x1103
www.lekcomp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Openvas-discuss <openvas-discuss-boun...@wald.intevation.org> On Behalf 
Of Jan-Oliver Wagner
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 10:09 AM
To: openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
Subject: Re: [Openvas-discuss] Trying to decide the right install

Am Montag, 19. März 2018, 16:31:45 schrieb Stewart Joseph:
> Thanks.  At least I’m making progress.  Then what is the difference in 
> the feeds for the GSMCE and the GCE?  http://www.openvas.org/vm.html 
> indicates that the GSMCE would use the community feeds just like the 
> GCE.  https://www.greenbone.net/en/community-edition/ implies that the 
> GSMCE has the same as the GSM.  Maybe I’m misreading it but they seem 
> at odds.  Which would it have?

The GCE default and the Open Source stand-alone modules both use the GCF. The 
feed content is identical for both setups, but a setup from source code might 
be missing some build configs, tools or maybe you have older system crypto 
libraries or alike.

--
Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner |  +49-541-760278-0  |  http://www.greenbone.net/ 
Greenbone Networks GmbH, Neumarkt 12, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B
202460
Geschäftsführer: Lukas Grunwald, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner 
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to