That forum convo says the Nessus one has reported considerable false
positives.

If you are testing with 4 different scripts (openvas, nessus, metasploit,
and ssltest.py) and only nessus is saying it is vulnerable, isn't that a
75% chance it is false positive?

Do you believe it is vulnerable? Have you patched and nessus still claims
it is vuln?



On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> i have seen grave differences between the OpenVAS NVT, some test
> scripts, the Metasploit module and the Nessus plugin and have posted
> them at the Nessus discussion forums:
>
> https://discussions.nessus.org/message/25363#25363
>
> It seems Nessus reported vulnerable servers where the OpenVAS NVT, the
> test scripts and the Metasploit module shows a not vulnerable server.
>
> Anyone have some time to do some tests about this?
> _______________________________________________
> Openvas-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
>



-- 
http://volatile-minds.blogspot.com -- blog
http://www.volatileminds.net -- website
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wald.intevation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss

Reply via email to