On Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 8:46 PM Ray Sun <xiaoq...@gmail.com> wrote: > OpenStackers, > I have several questions for using kolla deployment in production: > 1. Binary or source? Which one is mostly used in production >
I've heard a lot more reports from people running source, but this is anecdotal 2. Which one is easy to operation, like updating.. > IMHO source is better for updates. With binary you sit around waiting for packages to decide a patch or stable milestone is worthy of dropping new packages. With source you can get things when they hit stable branches upstream. I did exactly one binary deployment, waited forever for a patch I needed, and swore off doing it that way forever more. Operations are the same either way really. ... > 3. Is there any document to describe how to operation kolla deployment > OpenStack, seems it's not the quite same with the bare metal deployment. > The deployment docs are quite good. There isn't really a good ops guide though. This is true of bare metal as well though ( in process of being addressed presently). The IRC channel is terrific though, so if you hit a wall, pop on there and ask for help or email this list with a tag like you did here. > > Thanks. > > Best Regards > -- Ray > Cherrs, Erik _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
