Ah, thanks - but when you say nova may not have set them yet is it at all possible that it would get set prior to an IPAM request?
[image: --] Gregory Golberg [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg <http://about.me/gregorygolberg?promo=email_sig> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub> wrote: > Nova may not have set them yet. The port is updated with the host ID and > the device ID separately from the port creation in later Nova versions > IIRC. > > On Apr 10, 2017 10:03, "Gregory Golberg" <gri...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > >> Sorry, that should read host AND instance ID (as the device_id was >> instance_uuid). >> >> >> >> [image: --] >> Gregory Golberg >> [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg >> <http://about.me/gregorygolberg?promo=email_sig> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Gregory Golberg <gri...@alum.mit.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> In Liberty, port object that got passed into IPAM driver contained >>> binding:host_id entry (and neutron.ports DB table had a device_id field). >>> Now it looks like the host_id is not being passed in and device_id field is >>> empty in the ports table. >>> >>> What is the proper way now to look for host in during the IPAM request? >>> >>> >>> [image: --] >>> Gregory Golberg >>> [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg >>> <http://about.me/gregorygolberg?promo=email_sig> >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi >> -bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi >> -bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
