On 26/05/16 19:49, German Anders wrote:
Hi all,
We're in the middle of a transition from Icehouse release with a network
model using nova-network and a single VLAN to Kilo release. With Kilo we
would like to
use Neutron and multiple VXLAN tunnels, so I just wondering if someone
has pass throw a similar scenario and how do you resolved it?
Is better to have only one vRouter? or many? is there any known
limitations? We've almost 1000 physical servers and 5000 instances.
Another concern is how can we expose the new instances born inside of
this "tunnel" layer (Kilo release) to our existing non-VxLAN scenario
(Icehouse), we've many different types of applications like DBs, load
balancers, webservices, etc.
We would like to avoid the use of floating ip addresses assigned to
every instance and also avoid any SPoF and bottlenecks on the network nodes.
Ideas? possible types of architectures to use here? Also Is neutron
stable at Kilo release or is better to go with another OpenStack release
that has Neutron more developed for production?
If you can get to Juno, this script might work for you:
https://github.com/NeCTAR-RC/novanet2neutron
There's also this icehouse fork:
https://github.com/kevinbringard/novanet2neutron/tree/icehouse
You'll find friends who've done it before in the Large Deployments Team:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Large_Deployment_Team
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
