Here's my test setup: - Single node - Single replica - 4 disks: /srv/node/r1, r2, r3 and r4. - Backed by SSDs
Unfortunately, I don't have the logs when the object was first written. But can definitely say that it returned 201. This is done using an application (not manually). We also logged that the object was written successfully. The failure during reads is here: http://pastie.org/private/pwasrois7xi18rzywpzaw. Notice that the requests only go to r4 and r2. And swift-get-nodes suggest that these are the first two nodes to try. http://pastie.org/private/qfe5ilywpsysu3lfnrvcw The actual object in this case was on the second handoff node r1. I could stat the .data file on r1. >> No it wouldn't - again it's expected there would be *multiple* replicas - >> possibly all on handoff nodes. But even a single copy on a single handoff >> would be enough to service the request, unless that node was not responding >> for some other reason (mis-configuration of some kind?) The configuration is pretty straightforward. The disks are the same size, weight = 100 for all of them. Single server, so not much to do while creating the rings. -Shri _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack