On 20/05/16 20:03, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:46:05 +1200
Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
May 18 04:31:17 markir-dev-ostor002 object-server: object replication
failure 4, detail Traceback (most recent call last):#012 File
"/opt/cat/openstack/swift/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/swift/obj/replicator.py",
line 622, in build_replication_jobs#012 int(partition))#012ValueError:
invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'auditor_status_ALL.json'#012
Mark, I saw the patch you attached to the bug 1583305, but it only deals
with counting of failures. It does nothing to ignore auditor's files, it seems.
Would you be willing to cook up something like Tim's fix in commit
ad16e2c77bb61bdf51a7d3b2c258daf69bfc74da
?
-- Pete
Hi Peter,
My patch was meant to be in addition to Clay's (attached earlier to
bug), which does have logic to handle the auditor's files, sorry if that
wasn't clear.And I agree with what you are saying.
Doing some testing with just Clay's patch applied, I'm not seeing any
'extra' errors from the timeout sections that I was seeing
previously...now it might be that my test setup is just a bit different
now, or that Clay's changes stop the othererrors happening (I'll watch a
bit more).
My next head scratching moment is the *success* count seems too high(I
know...I'm complaining about too much success- heh...some folk never
satisfied) - I have a 3 device system (3 replicas) with 2 objects
uploaded...and the replication stats are saying "12 successes"...err-
was expecting *6 successes* - wtf? I need to examine how these counts
are being calculated, as it seems theycould possibly be not quite right.
Cheers
Mark
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
