Thanks Chris that makes sense. Let me play with it and see how far I get.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Chris Buccella < chris.bucce...@antallagon.com> wrote: > Can you utilize two ResourceGroups, one with cinder volumes and one > without? Then use two parameters, servers_with_volumes_count and > servers_without_volumes_count which will map to the count parameter for > ResourceGroup. It's ok for count to be 0: > > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Heat::ResourceGroup-prop-count > > > -Chris > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Brent Troge <brenttroge2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> I have a heat template which accepts parameters/values via an environment >> file. >> This heat template creates x amount of cinder volumes based on the >> parameter value >> defined in the environment file. >> >> I have instances that dont require cinder volumes, so it is possible that >> the instances could >> also use the same template. However HEAT chokes because I dont provide >> values to create the cinder volumes. >> >> So instead of having two templates, is it possible to put a conditional >> check within >> the heat template. >> The condition check would be something like: >> >> if cinder volume size = 0, then dont exercise the cinder resources >> statements. >> >> I am not sure something like this is currently supported by heat. So >> hopefully the community has some suggestions or clues. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
