There are around 500+ ipv6 and ~500 ipv4 networks in "neutron net-list".Almost all are same ipv6 subnets .
I will try to recreate this with small number of ipv6 subnet in a different setup. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Sridhar Gaddam <sgad...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 11/18/2015 08:28 PM, Brian Haley wrote: > >> On 11/18/2015 07:33 AM, kevin parrikar wrote: >> >>> i am trying Juno *without *DVR and there are around 500 sub nets in each >>> network >>> node. >>> >>> Network nodes have 500+ dnsmasq process which are configured to give >>> ipv6,ipv4 >>> addresses out of this some fluctuates between D and S state while others >>> are in >>> continuous S state.Probably because of too many processes in D state with >>> "rtnetlink_rcv" in "wchan" its showing very high load average. >>> >>> >>> functions in stack when in D state: >>> >>> [<ffffffff816360a9>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x19/0x30 >>> [<ffffffff81653e25>] netlink_unicast+0xd5/0x1b0 >>> [<ffffffff8165420e>] netlink_sendmsg+0x30e/0x680 >>> [<ffffffff8160e32b>] sock_sendmsg+0x8b/0xc0 >>> [<ffffffff8160e871>] SYSC_sendto+0x121/0x1c0 >>> [<ffffffff8160f25e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 >>> [<ffffffff817342dd>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f >>> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff >>> >>> but in couple of seconds it changes to S state with this in stack,all >>> idle >>> process have this in stack. >>> >>> [<ffffffff811d20d9>] poll_schedule_timeout+0x49/0x70 >>> [<ffffffff811d2ac6>] do_select+0x5b6/0x780 >>> [<ffffffff811d2e5c>] core_sys_select+0x1cc/0x2e0 >>> [<ffffffff811d301b>] SyS_select+0xab/0x100 >>> [<ffffffff817342dd>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f >>> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff >>> >>> interface in which dnsmasq is listening has " tentative dadfailed" in >>> "scope >>> global" for ipv6 for all the dnsmasq process that are in D state. >>> >>> i don't understand why duplicate ipv6 issue is coming when there are >>> vlan tags >>> to separate each sub net.For ipv4 duplicate IP issue is not coming for >>> same subnet. >>> >> >> DAD failure is fatal for the address, as it won't be tried again without >> bouncing the interface or tweaking the disable_ipv6 sysctl on the >> interface. The "tentative" flag is just showing it is still in that state >> (i.e. waiting for DAD to complete). Figuring out why this is happening >> will most likely solve your problem, but there isn't enough here to go on. >> >> The fact that you don't see an IPv4 'duplicate' message is that it's not >> going to typically do it, so you could have a duplicate there and just not >> know it. >> >> I'd say to try Kilo or Liberty, but it's unclear if this is a Neutron >> issue or something more basic with your setup. >> >> Agree with Brian. > Is the problem seen even with a single (or say two) IPv6 subnets? Or is it > seen only at scale? > > -Brian >> >> >> Not able to understand why dnsmasq that are connected to interfaces that >>> have >>> "tentative dadfailed " continuously changes between S and D state while >>> others >>> are idle. >>> >>> attached is the strace while dnsmasq is in D state. >>> >>> Any idea about this issue? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >>> Unsubscribe : >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack