Excerpts from Andrew Bogott's message of 2015-09-16 10:03:48 -0700: > My users are mostly happy with VMs, but I get occasional requests for > physical hardware in order to host databases, run performance tests, > etc. I'd love to rack a dozen small servers and graft the ironic > service onto my existing cloud in order to fulfill these sporadic > needs. I'm given pause, though, by this doc section: > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/deploy/install-guide.html#configure-compute-to-use-the-bare-metal-service > > For example, this: > > compute_driver=nova.virt.ironic.IronicDriver > > > That would have me changing nova settings in such a way that would > clearly make nova /only/ support bare-metal, disabling its > virtualization facilities. Does that mean that bare metal is really an > either/or proposition, or is there some way to make bare metal and virt > services coexist on a single nova installation? Or is there an > in-between option that involves installing a second nova stack on > different nodes with a different config? > > -- Bonus Question -- > > I'm still using nova-network. Is anyone using ironic without neutron? > Or, if not, is that at least theoretically possible? >
Yes, you need to use host aggregates. You would put the ironic compute hosts into an aggregate, and all of the other compute hosts into another, and then have the extra_specs in the flavor set to whichever aggregate you want the instance to go to. This can definitely get a little tricky with the networking if you're using overlays, since Ironic can't really attach a hardware node to a software managed L2 network, but you can just make sure users understand which networks will be available on which flavors and that should work. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack