I have a similar option and was going to offer to do this as well :-)
I won't have as much RAM but for a POC and some dev work it should be ok.
Regards
Lance
On 22/04/2015 21:06, Pirate Fibonacci wrote:
Thiago,
excellent configuration. This configuration is worthy of a step by set
up write-up if it doesn't already exist.
do you have a script or notes on how to do this? I'll be giving the
above configuration a try really soon. I would be
willing to document and share it.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ
<thiagocmarti...@gmail.com <mailto:thiagocmarti...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Lance,
Currently, I'm running all nodes as VMs (everything is Ubuntu
14.04.2 - 64-bit - Minimum Installation), to test it.
Where:
1- Physical Host with KVM - 4 physical ethernets - 32G of RAM;
1- VM with Juno Controller - 1 ethernet VirtIO - 4G;
1- VM with Juno Network - 3 ethernet VirtIO - 2G;
1- VM with Juno Compute - 2 ethernet VirtIO - 16G + KVM with
Nested Virtualization, where the VM can have its own VMs without
being slow);
1- VM with Kilo Controller - 1 ethernet VirtIO - 4G;
1- VM with Kilo Network - 3 ethernet VirtIO - 2G;
1- VM with Kilo Compute - 2 ethernet VirtIO -16G + KVM with Nested
Virtualization, where the VM can have its own VMs without being slow);
NOTE: Both the Host and Kilo VMs, have the same "Ubuntu Cloud
Archive" enabled (`add-apt-repository cloud-archive:kilo`). So, I
can get the latest libvirt + QEmu for the Host itself. And Juno
VMs have `add-apt-repository cloud-archive:juno` archive.
For a production environment, I'm sure you can have at least, the
Controller as a VM. While the Network node will be a bit slow as a
VM, but it works.
Also, I have enabled at the Host and at the Compute Nodes, KSM and
VHOST_NET at /etc/default/qemu-kvm config file. So I can share RAM
memory pages between VMs (KSM) and speed up the network traffic
(VHOST).
Cheers!
Thiago
On 21 April 2015 at 12:25, Lance Haig <la...@haigmail.com
<mailto:la...@haigmail.com>> wrote:
Thank you.
I know that OS is available from a number of distributions.
Which OS would be the best to use for a Juno install.
Regards
Lance
On 20/04/2015 17:22, Remo Mattei wrote:
You should be fine since nfs is one of the supported back-end.
Remo
Inviato da iPhone
Il giorno 20/apr/2015, alle ore 07:55, Lance Haig
<la...@haigmail.com <mailto:la...@haigmail.com>> ha
scritto:
Hi,
I am in the process of planning an openstack
deployment and was wondering if you could host the
controller and network nodes as VM's on a KVM compute
node?
I have 2 Physical hosts and a small NFS SAN right now
and would like to utilise the resources of both
initially before the solution expands.
Is this a supported solution?
Regards
Lance
--
Lance Haig
Cape Town
_______________________________________________
Mailing list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>
Unsubscribe :
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
!DSPAM:1,55351792323155023812812!
--
Lance Haig
0799078000
Cape Town
_______________________________________________
Mailing list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>
Unsubscribe :
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
_______________________________________________
Mailing list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>
Unsubscribe :
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
--
Lance Haig
0799078000
Cape Town
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
