Hi All, I can see the obvious distinction between cinder-snapshot and cinder-backup being that snapshots would live on the same storage back end as the active volume (using that ever snapshotting that provides) where the backup would be to different storage.
We're using Ceph for volume and object storage so it seems like running cinder-backup in that case (with active, snap, and backup would be all in essentially the same backend) would not make a whole lot of sense. Is my thinking right on this or are there advantages of 'backup' over 'snapshot' that I'm not considering? -Jon _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
