The think is that CEPH already exists while Lustre would mean a new installation of it from scratch.

Best,

George


I think you should use lustre instead of ceph if you want above.

/Zee

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Georgios Dimitrakakis  wrote:

Christian,

thanks a lot for your suggestion!

Manila seems very promising.

Is anybody using manila??
Is it stable enough?

Best,

George

On 01/21/2015 12:59 AM, Georgios Dimitrakakis wrote:

 For my project it is important to provide concurrent access to
a
 mounted volume from different VMs.

 The access must be read/write. In order to do so I am
thinking of using
 a clustered filesystem like OCFS2 on top of CEPH.

 Do you have any experience on something similar? Any
recommendations
 are mostly welcome.

Maybe Manila is an option for you. This is a shared filesystem
service.

https://github.com/openstack/manila [1]

Christian.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack [2]
Post to     : openstack@lists.openstack.org [3]
Unsubscribe :
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack [4]

--

Regards

Zeeshan Ali Shah
System Administrator - PDC HPC
PhD researcher (IT security)
Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan
+46 8 790 9115
http://www.pdc.kth.se/members/zashah [6]

Links:
------
[1] https://github.com/openstack/manila
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
[3] mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org
[4] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
[5] mailto:gior...@acmac.uoc.gr
[6] http://www.pdc.kth.se/members/zashah

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Reply via email to