On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell < kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> (Shouldn't this be on openstack-dev?) It's really a CLI usability question, I'm looking for a user audience. I know how I'd do it already. ;) > On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 14:10 -0600, Dean Troyer wrote: > > * Is --no-share the correct antonym of --share? --unshare maybe? We > > have a pattern of using regular English words were possible (enable| > > disable) rather than the GNU style of prepending 'no-' to options, but > > that is my current backup. > > My mental model insists that "--no-share" would remove all shares, so > perhaps that's not the correct antonym. How about "--grant" and > "--revoke"? > I'm not thrilled with --no-share either, but using that style has been suggested before. I do think grant/revoke are worth considering though, thanks. dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
