That's normal. See the "...or none can be due to min_part_hours". Swift is refusing to move more data until the stuff likely currently in flight has settled. See https://swiftstack.com/blog/2012/04/09/swift-capacity-management/
--John > On Dec 16, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Amit Anand <aan...@viimed.com> wrote: > > Hi John thank you! > > So I went ahead and added two more storage nodes to the existing rings > (object, account, container) and tried to rebalance on the controller I got > this: > > [root@controller swift]# swift-ring-builder object.builder rebalance > Reassigned 1024 (100.00%) partitions. Balance is now 38.80. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Balance of 38.80 indicates you should push this > ring, wait at least 1 hours, and rebalance/repush. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > For all three. So while waiting, I went ahead and added the *.gz files and > swift.conf to the new nodes and started the Object Storage Services on the > both the new storage nodes.... Now I am seeing this after I try to rebalance > after waiting about an hour: > > [root@controller swift]# swift-ring-builder object.builder rebalance > No partitions could be reassigned. > Either none need to be or none can be due to min_part_hours [1]. > > Devices 4,5,6,7 are the new ones I added in region 2. > > > [root@controller swift]# swift-ring-builder object.builder > object.builder, build version 9 > 1024 partitions, 3.000000 replicas, 2 regions, 2 zones, 8 devices, 38.80 > balance > The minimum number of hours before a partition can be reassigned is 1 > Devices: id region zone ip address port replication ip > replication port name weight partitions balance meta > 0 1 1 10.7.5.51 6000 10.7.5.51 > 6000 sda3 100.00 501 30.47 > 1 1 1 10.7.5.51 6000 10.7.5.51 > 6000 sda4 100.00 533 38.80 > 2 1 1 10.7.5.52 6000 10.7.5.52 > 6000 sda3 100.00 512 33.33 > 3 1 1 10.7.5.52 6000 10.7.5.52 > 6000 sda4 100.00 502 30.73 > 4 2 1 10.7.5.53 6000 10.7.5.53 > 6000 sda3 100.00 256 -33.33 > 5 2 1 10.7.5.53 6000 10.7.5.53 > 6000 sda4 100.00 256 -33.33 > 6 2 1 10.7.5.54 6000 10.7.5.54 > 6000 sda3 100.00 256 -33.33 > 7 2 1 10.7.5.54 6000 10.7.5.54 > 6000 sda4 100.00 256 -33.33 > > > > All three have -33.33 (container, object, account) for their balance. Is > this normal or did do something incorrect? It doesnt seem to be replicating > the data to the new nodes (or at least it looks like it stopped?) but I am > not sure. Would appreciate any insight. Thanks! > > Amit > > > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:49 PM, John Dickinson <m...@not.mn> wrote: > Sounds like you're looking for a global cluster. You don't need multiple > rings for this. Swift can support this. When you add a new device to a ring, > you add it in a different region, and Swift takes care of it for you. > > Here's some more information: > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/admin_guide.html#geographically-distributed-clusters > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcaTwhP_rPE > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpmBRqevuVU > > https://swiftstack.com/blog/2013/07/02/swift-1-9-0-release/ > https://swiftstack.com/blog/2012/09/16/globally-distributed-openstack-swift-cluster/ > https://www.swiftstack.com/docs/admin/cluster_management/regions.html > > > > --John > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Amit Anand <aan...@viimed.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I was wondering if anyone knew of any good blog posts and videos that could > > show/explain what I am trying to do. I have Juno setup and it working great > > (thanks to everyone on heres help)! Now, I would like to add two more > > Object Store nodes, but as a separate "datacenter" as it were and replicate > > between my existing ring and the new one. Now, Im not sure exactly what to > > do for the account/container/object rings and how to get them to replicate > > (so if one goes down the other will still continue to serve data). I am > > also going to try and add another storage node just as a backup for > > existing data. Would anyone have any good links to send me I would > > appreciate it! > > > > Thanks! > > Amit Anand > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
