Sure Brandon, My files ml2_conf.init looks like this:
--- [ml2] type_drivers = vlan tenant_network_types = vlan mechanism_drivers = openvswitch [ml2_type_flat] [ml2_type_vlan] network_vlan_ranges = physnet1:2090:4094 [ml2_type_gre] [ml2_type_vxlan] [securitygroup] enable_security_group = True firewall_driver = neutron.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver [ovs] enable_tunneling = False tenant_network_type = vlan integration_bridge = br-int network_vlan_ranges = physnet1:2090:4094 bridge_mappings = physnet1:br-eth1 --- My Compute Nodes have two ethernets, eth0 in for "Node Internet Access at vlan200" / "Node Management at vlan210" and eth1 is where the "VLAN Provider Network" traffic flows on top of "br-eth1"... Then I created each "net" as follows (1 for each tenant): --- neutron net-create --tenant-id $TENANT1_ID --provider:physical_network=physnet1 --provider:network_type=vlan --provider:segmentation_id=2090 physnet1-vlan2090 neutron net-create --tenant-id $TENANT2_ID --provider:physical_network=physnet1 --provider:network_type=vlan --provider:segmentation_id=2091 physnet1-vlan2091 --- And after this, I connected via Horizon, to create the "subnets" (both IPv4-dhcp and IPv6-static). Hope it helps! :-) Cheers! Thiago On 13 October 2014 19:17, Brandon Sawyers <brand...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would love to see your config for vlan provider networks. We're > interested in using these but are running into trouble getting it set up > correctly, even using the link you provided. > > Thanks, > Brandon > On Oct 13, 2014 2:40 PM, "Martinx - ジェームズ" <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> A few people asked me what kind of problems I reached when using >> GRE/VXLAN tunnels, well, here we go: >> >> --- >> I faced lots of problems with Neutron L3 Router in the past, now, I'm >> using in production, the topology called "VLAN Provider Networks" (no GRE / >> VXLAN tunnels, only plain Flat tagged VLANs). >> >> Like this: >> >> >> https://developer.rackspace.com/blog/neutron-networking-vlan-provider-networks/ >> >> It is by far, much more stable, even when with OpenvSwitch. No more >> Neutron L3 Router... I'll start testing it again, with Juno (because of its >> native IPv6 support, seems pretty cool, BTW), looking to put it into prod >> again with K... >> >> This way (Flat / VLAN provider), the Network Node runs only the dhcp and >> the metadata (iptables redirect to compute) services. >> >> Also, there is no GRE / VXLAN tunnels, only plain tagged VLANs. >> >> I have a guide to configure Flat Provider Network, which is very similar >> with VLANs (only that it have only 1 LAN, same topology with upstream >> router), take a look: >> https://github.com/tmartinx/openstack-guides/tree/master/IceHouse >> >> - >> Neutron L3 Router problems I faced (already fixed) - (there are more >> problems, like the one you're facing): >> >> Directional network performance issues with Neutron + OpenvSwitch: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1252900 - huge problem with a >> simple fix, by disabling gro with ethtool at your L3 Router >> >> Attaching a IPv6 private subnet to a L3 Router, breaks it and its IPv4 >> Floating IPs: >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1322945 >> - >> >> Another problem: >> >> Neutron router and nf_conntrack performance problems: >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/043269.html >> --- >> >> Not to mention that, when I first deployed OpenStack with Neutron L3 >> couple years ago, everything appeared to be working, Floating IPs, and ICMP >> connectivity but, when I tried to run "apt-get update" within a Instance. >> it did not worked... After digging a lot on the Interwebs, I figured out >> that I was seeing the infamous "MTU problem"... Lowering it to 1450 was the >> first workaround I touched with Neutron L3... >> >> Also, during the life cycle of random instances, it sees too many network >> outages. Forcing me (the architect / operator) to shutdown the instances >> lots of times, run `neutron-ovs-cleanup` at the network and compute nodes, >> compute nodes reboots and then, "out-of-nothing", instance got connectivity >> again... >> >> None of this problems exists on a plain VLAN topology. >> >> And BTW, from my point of view, it seems very weird to deploy IPv6 >> connectivity to the instances, on top of IPv4 tunnels! That GRE / VXLAN... >> While I like the idea of "per-tenant routers with private networks", I also >> like the idea of stability and of the performance of plain (V)LANs. Q-in-Q >> seems a nice approach either. >> >> - >> Thiago >> >> On 9 October 2014 23:17, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Just for the record, I gave up on Neutron L3 Router, powered by >>> GRE/VXLAN tunnels. There are too many problems on this architecture. >>> I'm using Flat/VLAN Provider Networks right now (still with OpenvSwitch >>> but, no problems), I'm looking for a new solution (with IPv6), I'll take a >>> look at OpenContrail! >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> On 9 October 2014 20:35, Rudrajit Tapadar < >>> rudrajit.tapadar+os...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> At Symantec's Cloud Platform Engineering, we have deployed >>>> OpenStack+OpenContrail at a fairly large scale. I can't give you exact >>>> numbers, but you can get some data points from our SDN evaluation >>>> presentation in the Atlanta summit: >>>> https://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-atlanta-2014/session-videos/presentation/software-defined-networking-performance-and-architecture-evaluation >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Raghu Vadapalli <rvatspac...@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/29/2014 01:52 PM, Tim Bell wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are there any references for people running OpenContrail at scale ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Though reference are good to have, in general, L3 networks are known >>>>> to scale better than L2 networks. >>>>> Having said that, the complexity of two large frameworks OpenStack + >>>>> OpenContrail working together nicely in >>>>> deployment is not known to me. Any ideas ? >>>>> >>>>> *From:* NAPIERALA, MARIA H [mailto:mn1...@att.com <mn1...@att.com>] >>>>> >>>>> *Sent:* 29 September 2014 19:26 >>>>> *To:* denni...@conversis.de >>>>> *Cc:* openstack@lists.openstack.org >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack] Rackspace abandons Open vSwitch ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> …… >>>>> >>>>> > What are the alternatives though? As far as I know the regular >>>>> linux >>>>> >>>>> > bridge lacks most of the features of OVS and these are the only to >>>>> >>>>> > options I've played with so far. Is the a third alternative out there >>>>> >>>>> > that they've switched to? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> One alternative is OpenContrail vRouter as ML3 plugin. It meets the >>>>> scale and feature requirements. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maria >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mailing list: >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>>>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >>>>> Unsubscribe : >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mailing list: >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>>>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >>>>> Unsubscribe : >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mailing list: >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >>>> Unsubscribe : >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack