HI all, I'm trying to deploy horizon with nginx, and to my surprise, the security guide advice against uwsgi, which is the WSGI server of choice for all my other WSGI apps.
In the security guide [1], it says When using nginx, we recommend gunicorn <http://docs.gunicorn.org/en/latest/deploy.html> as the wsgi host with an appropriate number of synchronous workers. We strongly advise against deployments using fastcgi, scgi, or uWSGI. We strongly advise against the use of synthetic performance benchmarks when choosing a wsgi server. Anyone know the reason behind this? Is it just personal preferences? I see uwsgi has its own benefits beyond being permanent. It has good documentation, easy nginx integration, is stable and is configurable. Why it is advised against? [1] http://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/content/ch025_web-dashboard.html -- *YY Inc. is hiring* openstack and python developers. Interested? Check http://soa.game.yy.com/jobs.html -- Thanks, Yuanle
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
