Great. Thanks John!!

On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:48 PM, John Dickinson <m...@not.mn> wrote:
> You are describing one of the ways that Swift does eventual consistency. In 
> the scenario you describe, it is indeed possible to get the older version of 
> the object on a read. There is no whole-cluster invalidation of an object. 
> Swift's behavior here gives you high availability of your data even when you 
> have failures in your cluster. Your proposed scenario can happen if a server 
> fails after the first write and is restored after the second write, but 
> before the read.
>
> However, there are a few things you can do on the client side. One option is 
> to keep track of the etag of the data you've sent. That way you can verify 
> that you're getting back what you expected to get back. Another option would 
> be to use a read request with the If-[Un]Modified-Since header (see 
> http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html).
>
> --John
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Shrinand Javadekar <shrin...@maginatics.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a question regarding the way object overwrites work in the
>> absence of versioning. I couldn't find this info in the documentation.
>>
>> Consider the case when I have an object O already present in the Swift
>> cluster. There are N replicas of this object. When a new PUT request
>> that overwrites object O is returned, Swift guarantees that the new
>> object, say O' got written successfully to N/2 + 1 object servers. But
>> there could be some replicas that still have the older object O.
>>
>> Does Swift have a way of invalidating the older object O on all object 
>> servers?
>>
>> If there is a GET request for object O, immediately after the
>> overwrite, does Swift guarantee that the older object O cannot be
>> returned?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>> -Shri
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>> Post to     : openstack@lists.openstack.org
>> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
>

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Reply via email to