Thanks for the responses Sam, John! On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:11 AM, John Dickinson <m...@not.mn> wrote: > > On Jul 30, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Samuel Merritt <s...@swiftstack.com> wrote: > >> On 7/30/14, 10:18 AM, Shrinand Javadekar wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Swift v1 allowed for geo replication using read and write affinity >>> rules. Now, Swift v2 allows setting storage policies (which can affect >>> replication) per container. I wanted to know if/how these two >>> intersect. Some of the following are straight-forward questions, just >>> wanted to get a confirmation. >>> >>> 1. If I have Swift v2.0 installation, can I enable geo replication >>> without having a separate storage policy? >> >> Yes. >> >>> 2. How does a user enable both geo replication and have storage policies? >> >> Enable geo-replication with the read_affinity and write_affinity settings as >> usual, then define some storage policies. >> >>> 3. Are there plans of consolidating geo replication and storage policies? >> >> No; they're orthogonal. > > But geo-clusters and storage policies go very well together, since polices > allows you to have some data geographically distributed and other data in > specific different locations. > > --John > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >
-- --- Make the Openstack Summit talks in Paris awesome by voting for our talks! http://bit.ly/1nO6grS _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
