Hi Frans, Here's my perspective.
There's some tradeoff between different choices. First of all, you should know your use case clearly before make decision. There's several combo : - OpenStack Swift as object storage core + Cinder as the the block storage controller with various backends - OpenStack Swift as object storage core + Ceph RBD interface as the block storage - Rados storage pools as the backend for Swift/S3 APIs(Ceph RadosGW) and Ceph RBD If you would like to have full benefits of OpenStack Swift, you should take OpenStack Swift as the object storage core. You can have 100% features of Swift and a built-in http request handler. If you'd like to store everything on a unified storage infrastructure, you can go Ceph. But you'll lose part of feature of Swift. Regarding to the Cinder or Ceph. Well, Cinder allows you to use different backend. It depends on the cost, use case, reliability etc. It might be good to hear the use cases there. Hope it help Hugo 2014-07-15 10:20 GMT+08:00 Frans Thamura <fr...@meruvian.org>: > Hi all > > just discussion regarding ceph as platform for swift and cinder, and > also a replacement. > > i still want to know, how ceph stand > > because we can run swift and cinder also without ceph > > and why should ceph as both platform, > > F > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
