I believe that the volume delete will clear the volume first (dd if=/dev/zero).

The volume resize option was implemented in Havana.

You can try to resize to 1G instead of 0.

I hope this helps.

-Yehia

From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 11:21 AM
To: Ruzicka, Marek
Cc: Udara Liyanage; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Large volume creation takes long time



On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Ruzicka, Marek 
<marek.ruzi...@t-systems.sk<mailto:marek.ruzi...@t-systems.sk>> wrote:
Can’t help you here… I’m still running Grizzly, and volume resize came in 
IceHouse I believe.

Marek


From: Udara Liyanage 
[mailto:udaraliyan...@gmail.com<mailto:udaraliyan...@gmail.com>]
Sent: 23. mája 2014 07:28
To: Ruzicka, Marek
Cc: openstack@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Large volume creation takes long time

HI marek,
Thanks for the reply.
By the way how to resize a volume to zero. I found "cinder extend" command 
where volumes can be extended. How to shrink the volume to zero?

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:52 AM, 
<marek.ruzi...@t-systems.sk<mailto:marek.ruzi...@t-systems.sk>> wrote:
I’m not 100% sure, but I remember (depending on the driver you are using) it 
used to zero entire volume before deletion, which might or might not make sense 
for you.
Sorry for not being able to provide any details, this is just something I 
remember from way back.

Cheers,
Marek

From: Udara Liyanage 
[mailto:udaraliyan...@gmail.com<mailto:udaraliyan...@gmail.com>]
Sent: 23. mája 2014 07:00
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [Openstack] Large volume creation takes long time

Hi,
When it tries to delete a large sized volume, it takes a long time. Is there a 
another better way to do  this such as resizing a volume to zero.

--
Udara S.S Liyanage.
Software Engineer at WSO2.
Commiter and PPMC Member of Apache Stratos.
Blog - http://udaraliyanage.wordpress.com<http://udaraliyanage.wordpress.com/>
phone: +94 71 443 6897<tel:%2B94%2071%20443%206897>



--
Udara S.S Liyanage.
Software Engineer at WSO2.
Commiter and PPMC Member of Apache Stratos.
Blog - http://udaraliyanage.wordpress.com<http://udaraliyanage.wordpress.com/>
phone: +94 71 443 6897<tel:%2B94%2071%20443%206897>

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : 
openstack@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
​The writing zeros to the volume on delete is indeed what you're seeing, it's a 
"feature" that is there for security purposes, so for example a public provider 
doesn't hand out a new volume to a tenant with the possibility of allocating 
blocks with somebody elses data on them.

You can switch to using "lvm_type=thin" in your cinder.conf file which will 
basically handle this by returning zero for blocks that haven't been written 
yet (so we don't do the secure delete).  Or as was suggested if you don't need 
the secure delete option you can turn it off altogether by setting 
"volume_clear=none" in your cinder.conf file.

As far as adjusting the size to zero, we don't allow reducing the volume size, 
only extending.  Reducing introduces quite a bit of risk and also it doesn't 
address the problem that secure_delete is there for anyway.

Thanks,
John​

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Reply via email to