Hi Matt, Regarding your answer the driver seems to handle VLAN mode but I still don't see how it can without a specific neutron plugin. From what I see from the code there is no any call for IVM "mkdev -vlan" and "-tagid" parameters.
Should I extend it myself or am I missing something ? Regards, Florian CHAZAL On 21 March 2014 18:52, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > On 3/21/2014 6:45 PM, Florian Chazal wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Better late that never: >> >> Since few weeks we are testing IBM Power System R2 server and we were >> evaluating the capability to go on a larger scale. We are lacking of >> information regarding PowerKVM status and PowerVC so we began to try >> Havana + powerVM: >> The launch of a VM went well (except an issue with glance which does not >> gzip the image ... troubleshoot in process) but how does it works >> regarding the network ? What type of network configuration it has been >> tested with ? >> >> Thank you in advance, >> >> Florian CHAZAL >> >> >> On 25 November 2013 08:26, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com >> <mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:14:00 AM, Anne Gentle wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez >> <thie...@openstack.org <mailto:thie...@openstack.org> >> <mailto:thie...@openstack.org <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>>__> >> >> wrote: >> >> Chuck Short wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Michael Still >> <mi...@stillhq.com <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com> >> <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com>> >> > <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com> >> <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com <mailto:mi...@stillhq.com>>>> wrote: >> > >> >> So, a few questions... >> >> >> >> - If there are no users shall we remove it from >> Havana and >> Grizzly as >> >> well, or does that violate our stability principles >> too much? >> > >> > >> > Speaking with my stable maintainers hat on I would >> personally >> NACK this >> > since >> > it doesnt meet the standard of a stable maintenance >> requirement, >> imho. >> >> It definitely doesn't meet our stable maintenance rules. We >> want >> people >> to be able to safely upgrade to the latest stable/* when >> they are >> users >> of the release. We don't add new features, removing them >> would be even >> worse. >> >> >> - If we don't remove the code from stable, what about >> removing all >> >> references from the stable docs and putting in a >> warning >> saying that >> >> powervm is a dead end instead? I want to minimise >> confusion >> on the >> >> part of people deploying stable releases. >> > >> > This would be okay in my opinion. >> >> At the very minimum I would add the "dead-end" comment to >> the Havana >> release notes. If Anne is fine by it, it could also be >> added to the >> stable/havana version of the docs. >> >> >> PowerVM was mostly documented in developer docs in the nova repo. >> It >> also has entries in the Configuration Reference in the nova.conf >> options tables from our autodoc process. Those will just stay in >> the >> stable/havana repo, but I'm okay with backporting a note to >> stable/havana with a clear message as to the driver's fate. We >> also >> have a mention of PowerVM in stable/grizzly where we could also >> place >> a note. Release notes are a good place for this as well, thanks >> Russell. >> >> Tracking with >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/__openstack-manuals/+bug/1254780 >> >> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1254780> -- >> feel free >> to add the nova project as well to ensure the docs in the nova >> repo >> are removed. >> >> I do want to point out that we don't have adequate documentation >> of >> other drivers, like Hyper-V and Xen, just want to make sure you >> all >> know there are gaps and documentation isn't the indicator of >> "acceptance" of a hypervisor driver. >> Thanks - >> Anne >> >> -- >> Thierry Carrez (ttx) >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack< >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack> >> >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org> >> <mailto:openstack@lists.__openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org>> >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack< >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack> >> >> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack< >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack> >> >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org> >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack< >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack> >> >> >> >> Also to relay what was discussed in nova IRC this morning, this >> topic is on the release meeting agenda for tomorrow: >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/__wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting#_ >> _Agenda_for_next_meeting >> >> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting# >> Agenda_for_next_meeting> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt Riedemann >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack >> >> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack> >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org> >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack >> >> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Florian Chazal >> > > Hi Florian, > > Some details on what testing we did internally with running Tempest: > > - Controller/Compute Node: RHEL 6.3-6.5, Fedora 19 ppc64 > - Hypervisor: PowerVM IVM 2.2.2.0+ > - Platform: P7 and P7+ Racks, Blades, ITEs > - Networking: > - Neutron + Open vSwitch: Flat, VLAN - IPv4 only > - nova-network: Flat > - Cinder Storage Driver: Storwize/SVC 6.4.1/6.4.2 for FC > > There are some teams here working on getting a PowerVC nova virt driver > into Stackforge. > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt Riedemann > > -- Florian Chazal
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
