Excerpts from Dnsbed Ops's message of 2014-01-02 18:15:12 -0800: > On 2014-1-3 5:13, Clint Byrum wrote: > > MogileFS isn't really a file system. There is a FUSE plugin but nobody > > really wants to use it that way. It works basically identically to S3 > > and Swift for a single tenant, though its APIs is a native protocol > > instead of HTTP (uploads and downloads are still HTTP). It doesn't have > > the concept of "containers" and is just a big flat key/value store, > > and it doesn't have multi-tenants, but it is basically a predecessor of > > today's object stores. > > Really? We have been using Mogilefs as an object storage in the > production environment with multi-tenants supported based on its > "domain" features. >
It has been several years since I deployed MogileFS. I suppose it has learned some new tricks. :) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
