On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Mike Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: […] > Now that I've said all this, cells does handle these three problems very > nicely by partitioning them all off and coordinating the api. However, there > are some missing features that I think are not trivial to implement. I'm also > not a fan of how cells decentralizes data and messaging, but I digress. I > feel like much more development needs to be done on it and I'm not sure I > really like the structure and requirements. I guess my view of cells is that > it's a good way to partition clouds into a hierarchy and divide failure > domains. I just don't think it's the end all in matters of scale in it's > current state. I'm hopeful that we can flesh this out a bunch more in > Icehouse.
I would think that de-centralizing is key when going for ultimate scale. But I am extremely interested in people's input and would love to get a group of people together to help 'make it right'. :) - Chris _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
