I believe it's still needed: upstream kernel have pushed back against the modules it provides, but neutron needs them to deliver the gre tunnels.
-Rob On 3 October 2013 13:15, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi James, > > Let me ask you something... > > Are you using the package `openvswitch-datapath-dkms' from Havana Ubuntu > Cloud Archive with Linux 3.8? > > I am unable to compile that module on top of Ubuntu 12.04.3 (with Linux 3.8) > and I'm wondering if it is still required or not... > > Thanks! > Thiago > > > On 2 October 2013 06:14, James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi Folks >> >> I'm seeing an odd direction performance issue with my Havana test rig >> which I'm struggling to debug; details: >> >> Ubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.8 backports kernel, Havana Cloud Archive >> (currently Havana b3, OpenvSwitch 1.10.2), OpenvSwitch plugin with GRE >> overlay networks. >> >> I've configured the MTU's on all of the physical host network >> interfaces to 1546 to add capacity for the GRE network headers. >> >> Performance between instances within a single tenant network on >> different physical hosts is as I would expect (near 1GBps), but I see >> issues when data transits the Neutron L3 gateway - in the example >> below churel is a physical host on the same network as the layer 3 >> gateway: >> >> ubuntu@churel:~$ scp hardware.dump 10.98.191.103: >> hardware.dump >> 100% 67MB 4.8MB/s >> 00:14 >> >> ubuntu@churel:~$ scp 10.98.191.103:hardware.dump . >> hardware.dump >> 100% 67MB >> 66.8MB/s 00:01 >> >> As you can see, pushing data to the instance (via a floating ip >> 10.98.191.103) is painfully slow, whereas pulling the same data is >> x10+ faster (and closer to what I would expect). >> >> iperf confirms the same: >> >> ubuntu@churel:~$ iperf -c 10.98.191.103 -m >> - ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Client connecting to 10.98.191.103, TCP port 5001 >> TCP window size: 22.9 KByte (default) >> - ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 3] local 10.98.191.11 port 55330 connected with 10.98.191.103 port 5001 >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 60.8 MBytes 50.8 Mbits/sec >> [ 3] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet) >> >> ubuntu@james-page-bastion:~$ iperf -c 10.98.191.11 -m >> >> >> - ------------------------------------------------------------ >> Client connecting to 10.98.191.11, TCP port 5001 >> TCP window size: 23.3 KByte (default) >> - ------------------------------------------------------------ >> [ 3] local 10.5.0.2 port 52190 connected with 10.98.191.11 port 5001 >> [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >> [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.07 GBytes 918 Mbits/sec >> [ 3] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet) >> >> >> 918Mbit vs 50Mbits. >> >> I tcpdump'ed the traffic and I see alot of duplicate acks which makes >> me suspect some sort of packet fragmentation but its got me puzzled. >> >> Anyone have any ideas about how to debug this further? or has anyone >> seen anything like this before? >> >> Cheers >> >> James >> >> >> - -- >> James Page >> Ubuntu and Debian Developer >> james.p...@ubuntu.com >> jamesp...@debian.org >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ >> >> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSS+QSAAoJEL/srsug59jD8ZcQAKbZDVU8KKa7hsic7+ulqWQQ >> EFbq8Im5x4mQY7htIvIOM26BR0ktAO5luE7zMBXsA4AwPud1BQSGhw89/NvNhADT >> TLcGdQADsomeiBpJebzwUmvL/tYUoMDRA3O96mUn2pi0fySWbEuEgMDjDJ/ow23D >> Y7nEv0mItaZ4MBSI9RZcqsDUl7UbbdlGejSWhJcwp/127HMU9nYwWNz5UHJjsGZ1 >> eITyv1WZH/dYPQ1SES41qD1WvkTBugopGJvptEyrcO62A+akGOvnqpsHgPECbLb+ >> b/8rk8nB1HB74Wh+tQP4WRQCZYso15nB6ukIyIU24Qti2tXtXDdKwszEoblCwCT3 >> YZJTERNOENURlUEFwgi6FNL+nZomSG0UJU6qqDGiUJkbSF7SwJm4y8/XRlJM2Ihn >> wyxFB0qe3YdMqgDLZn11GwCDqn3g11hYaocHNUyRaj/tgxhGKbOFvix5kz3I4V7T >> gd+sqUySMVd9wCRXBzDDhCuG9xf/QY2ZQxXzyfPJWd9svPh/O6osTSQzaI1eZl9/ >> jVRejMAFr6Rl11GPKd3DYi32GXa896QELjBmJ9Kof0NDlCcDuUKpVeifIhcbQZZV >> sWyQmbb6Z/ypFV9xXiLRfH2fW2bAQQHgiQGvy9apoE78BWYdnsD8Q3Ekwag6lFqp >> yUwt/RcRXS1PbLG4EGFW >> =HTvW >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack