Hi Endre! I tried it too but, L3 do NAT even without needing it (i.e. when using public "routable" address for tenant's subnet)... I see that L3 "thinks" that it always needs to do NAT...
More details, as follows: Even using real public IPv4 for tenants (trying to avoid Floating IPs and / or NAT), at the network node, I'm still seeing SNAT rules within the chain "quantum-l3-agent-float-snat / quantum-l3-agent-float-snat"... How can I disable it, running my cloud entirely by pure routing (i.e. no NAT on L3)...? Making/tagging somehow the tenant subnet as public?! Tks! Thiago On 5 August 2013 08:03, Endre Karlson <endre.karl...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI I think you should be able to put your instances directly on the > public network with Quantum no? > > Endre. > > > 2013/8/5 Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> > >> Guys! >> >> I'm so tired of dealing with this NAT-thing, called here as "Floating >> IPs" or "L3 + Auto NAT for you that you can't disable it easily"... >> >> This thing's got to go! >> >> So! We have IPv6, all public addresses, no NAT table for it (thanks >> Nerds), all public, as firsts days of the Internet... Good days... >> >> I'm wondering when OpenStack will works in a pure IPv6 environment, any >> ideas?! >> >> I do not want to deal with NAT tables anymore, neither "Floating IPs"... >> This is all $#%#% for me. >> >> >> I just read the following OpenStack (I think) doc: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RaKIfaIpy0NhHtssWhlUYgtzPpRgQzjJTF5N1DAKD_c/edit >> >> Which says: >> >> "IPv6 Only Tenant Network" <- YES!! >> >> "The router will not support v6 for NAT" <- YES! PLEASE! When?! >> >> >> NOTE: Please, if you guys are planning to enable "Floating IPs" for IPv6, >> PLEASE, don't do it! Or, at least, leave it entirely disabled by default... >> >> >> Forget about "NAT + Floating IPs" is a priority for my public cloud... I >> do not want ANY NAT table within my OpenStack environment, never. This is a >> very important part of my business plan: no NAT, no Floating IPs, public >> IPs everywhere. >> >> Maybe for Havana?! Is it mature enough, so I can test it today?! >> >> I just want to give automatically 1 IPv6 /64 for each tanant subnet and >> be happy... Also, tenants will be able to request more, pre-configured, >> IPv6 subnets, for sure... >> >> We're almost there?! Or maybe next year?! >> >> Tks! >> Thiago >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >> Unsubscribe : >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
