So if I add a virtual router I will have this working the models are not well describe why and that is a problem not only to me but others as well when to choose which one etc.
Inviato da iPad () Il giorno Jul 13, 2013, alle ore 13:44, Staicu Gabriel <gabriel_sta...@yahoo.com> ha scritto: > Hi Remo, > > If your talking about this document: > http://docs.openstack.org/grizzly/openstack-network/admin/content/use_cases_single_flat.html > I think that in that case you don't have something from the logical point of > view something like a router. You just have L2 segments so there is no place > where NAT can happen and therefore you can not use floating ip notion. > > In floating ip case practically the framework creates a static NAT between > the floating ip and the private ip that the instance receive when boots up. > > Regards, > Gabriel > > > From: Remo Mattei <r...@mattei.org> > To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 11:23 PM > Subject: [Openstack] Quantum question > > Hello everyone I was reading the doc and it was saying that model one on > quantum does not support floating ip address and I wonder why this limitation > > Thanks > Remo > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > !DSPAM:2,51e1bc37116571731430280!
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
