On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Everett Toews <everett.to...@rackspace.com>wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > > > > So, for example: > > > > - diablo supports Identity API v2.0 and was extensible to support a > non-OpenStack Identity API (v1.1) > > - essex supports Identity API v2.0 > > - folsom supports Identity API v2.0 > > - grizzly supports Identity API v2.0 and Identity API v3.0 > > - havana will support Identity API v2.0 and Identity API v3.1 > > - icehouse will support Identity API v2.0 and at least Identity API v3.1 > (if not v3.2) > > - J*release is not guaranteed to support Identity API v2.0 and will > support at least Identity API v3.1 (if not v3.3) > > Does anyone think a matrix of OpenStack version to supported API version > of each project would be useful to community developers? > > Should we include it in the documentation? > Seems like a good idea to me. Dolph's email was the first clear statement I'd seen from any PTL on the subject, so I'll be watching this thread and I'll log a doc bug if there's consensus and support to publish such a table. Anne > > The first column would be the OpenStack release, subsequent columns would > be the projects, and the cells would be versions. > > For example (I hope my formatting works), > > Release | Keystone | Nova | etc > Diablo | 2.0 | x.x | x.x > Essex | 2.0 | x.x | x.x > Folsom | 2.0 | x.x | x.x > Grizzly | 2.0, 3.0 | x.x | x.x > Havana | 2.0, 3.1 | x.x | x.x > Icehouse | 2.0, 3.1 | x.x | x.x > J | 3.1 | x.x | x.x > > Everett > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
