Hi Sam

I don't have a fix but I actually had the same problem but for a different 
reason.  I was trying to run keystone via apache and listen on multiple ports 
to support regular auth and external auth. I couldn't figure out how to map 
additional ports within keytstone. I'm very much interested in the solution 
here. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Samuel Winchenbach <swinc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I am attempting to set up a high availability openstack cluster.  Currently, 
> using pacemaker, I create a Virtual IP for all the highly available service, 
> launch haproxy to proxy all the requests and clone keystone to all the nodes. 
>   The idea being that the requests come into haproxy and are load balanced 
> across all the nodes.
> 
> 
> To do this I have keystone listen on 26000 for admin, and 26001 for public.  
> haproxy listens on 35357 and 5000 respectively (these ports are bound to the 
> VIP).  The problem with setup is that my log is filling (MB/min) with this 
> warning:
> 
> 2013-06-13 09:20:18     INFO [access] 127.0.0.1 - - [13/Jun/2013:13:20:18 
> +0000] "GET http://10.80.255.1:35357/v2.0/users HTTP/1.0" 200 915
> 2013-06-13 09:20:18  WARNING [keystone.contrib.stats.core] Unable to resolve 
> API as either public or admin: 10.80.255.1:35357
> ...
> ...
> 
> where 10.80.255.1 is my VIP for highly available services.   I traced down 
> that module and added a few lines of code for debugging and it turns out that 
> if checks to see if the incoming connection matches a port in the config 
> file.  In my case it does not.
> 
> I can not just bind keystone to the internal ip and leave the port as their 
> defaults because the way pacemaker checks to see if services are alive is by 
> sending requests to service it is monitoring, and I do not want to send 
> requests to the VIP because any instance of keystone could respond.   
> Basically I would I have to write a pacemaker rule for each node and it would 
> become messy quite quickly.
> 
> Does anyone see something I could do differently, or a fix for my current 
> situation?  
> 
> Thanks,
> Sam
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to