I haven't played that much with Glusterfs and pacemaker but I'm pretty sure that there is already a resource agent for this. Maybe the Filesystem RA can do it but you probably might have a look at the upstream version on the Cluster Lab Github.
Cheers On 15 févr. 2013, at 20:54, Samuel Winchenbach <swinc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, > > I think I will go with GlusterFS. MooseFS looks interesting, but > maintaining a package outside the repo/cloud archive is not something I want > to deal with. > > Along the same lines... is it possible to mount a GlusterFS volume in > pacemaker? I have tried both ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem and > ocf:redhat:netfs.sh without much luck. I have managed to get the service > started with upstart though. > > Thanks, > Sam > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Sébastien Han <han.sebast...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >>> Important: Mount the CephFS filesystem on the client machine, not the >>> cluster machine. >> >> It's just like NFS, if you mount an NFS export on the NFS server, you get >> kernel locks. >> >> Unfortunately even if love Ceph far more than the other, I won't go with >> CephFS, at least not know. But if are in a hurry and looking for a DFS then >> GlusterFS seems to be a good candidate. NFS works pretty well too. >> >> Cheers. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Sébastien Han. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:49 PM, JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso >> <juanfra.rodriguez.card...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Another one: >>> >>> - MooseFS >>> (http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/installing-moosefs-as-backend.html) >>> - GlusterFS >>> - Ceph >>> - Lustre >>> >>> Regards, >>> JuanFra >>> >>> >>> 2013/2/15 Samuel Winchenbach <swinc...@gmail.com> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Can anyone give me a recommendation for a good shared-storage cluster >>>> filesystem? I am running kvm-libvirt and would like to enable live >>>> migration. >>>> >>>> I have a number of hosts (up to 16) each with 2xTB drives. These hosts >>>> are also my compute/network/controller nodes. >>>> >>>> The three I am considering are: >>>> >>>> GlusterFS - I have the most experience with this, and it seems the easiest. >>>> >>>> CephFS/RADOS - Interesting because glance supports the rbd backend. >>>> Slightly worried because of this though "Important: Mount the CephFS >>>> filesystem on the client machine, not the cluster machine." (I wish it >>>> said why...) and "CephFS is not quite as stable as the block device and >>>> the object storage gateway." >>>> Lustre - A little hesitant now that Oracle is involved with it. >>>> >>>> If anyone has any advice, or can point out another that I should consider >>>> it would be greatly appreciated. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Sam >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >>>> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >>> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
