On 10 February 2013 03:27, Davide Guerri <davide.gue...@gmail.com> wrote: > Brady, thanks for the infos and for the bugzilla link. > > I made some tests and some some other researches about potential performance > penalties of LVM. These seem not to be noticeable especially with recent > linux versions. (please see for instance [1]). > > Now I'm even more curious about the choice of canonical: there must be a good > reason for using such "rough" (pass me the term) filesystem resize technique > over a more clean and practical lvm resize.
LVM is strictly more complexity: you still have to resize the block device, and resize the filesystem metadata on top of it. -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Cloud Services _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
