On 07/18/2012 04:53 AM, Hua ZZ Zhang wrote: > All networks information of all tenants are stored in one table. If the > name is defined unique, it implicates all tenants have to make sure the > name of new network will not be conflict with others even they don't > know each other. the system has to tell the tenant that "the name has > been used already by other tenants, please use another name to creat > network". This might be a confusing constraint to user.
Exactly. Which is why I support the name = label (non-unique, non-mandatory) position. Best, -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
