On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:45:48 +0000 Victor Rodionov <victor.rodio...@nexenta.com> wrote:
> Most of patch code was restructured, most of logic was moved to middleware > level and use hooks in Swift code. I create separate project (LFS middleware > https://github.com/nexenta/lfs) for now there are only 2 supported file > system types (XFS and ZFS) there. Also this middleware provide API for > getting file system status information (for example, for ZFS it's current > pool status, etc). It sounds strange to make Swift aware of the specific LFS. One day I come up with ZaitcevFS and what happens then? Patching Swift again I presume. I wish Gluster people would stop delaying their competing LFS proposal and finally submit it. Their code was out for a year, but they apparently are content to carry a fork forever: http://review.gluster.com/805 <==== for 1.4.5 http://review.gluster.com/3118 <==== for 1.4.8 -- Pete _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
