Hi, As a recent contributor to OpenStack, but with experience in other projects, I think moving in the directions you document would be good. And as you wrote, it's common practice in many many projects, which is another argument for this :-)
However, one comment: Le mercredi 27 juin 2012, à 11:52 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange a écrit : > It might be mentioned that Gerrit's handling of patch series is not entirely > perfect. This is a not a valid reason to avoid creating patch series. It'd be really great if we could first improve Gerrit to handle the patch series workflow in a better way. Without such a change, pushing patch series to Gerrit is really no fun for anyone :/ I've no idea if this is currently being worked on (at least, I don't really se an issue reported in Gerrit's issue tracker). Maybe we should sit down and at least document how we'd like to improve this specific workflow? Cheers, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
