On 06/13/2012 10:58 AM, Juan J. Martinez wrote: > On 13/06/12 15:42, Dan Prince wrote: >> Okay. It looks like Swift also still depends on swiftclient. Long term it >> would be nice if we could build and unit test swift without relying on the >> swiftclient package. Could we: >> > > I can't see the reason for that, swiftlclient is a dependency of swift > (as webob, greenlet, pastedeploy, etc).
I agree. At the moment it's slightly more ugly because we haven't finalized the pypi release process for our client libs... but we should have that in the next week or so, and then it should be perfectly possible to treat it just like anything else. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
