On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Ian Wells <ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk> wrote:
> On 7 June 2012 19:08, Dan Wendlandt <d...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Where was the reference to "quantum create_net xxx"? was it in the list > of > > all commands supported by the Quantum client? > > ( > http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/Validation-d1e447.html > ). > > Perhaps we should remove this list to avoid confusion, or put a > specific > > comment in the Nova section that "quantum create_net" should not be used. > > Yes, that was it. It's the first thing you run, so it stuck in mind; > it looks like perfectly reasonable command to be running; and it comes > back with precisely the UUID you expect to see, with the sole > difference that that ID doesn't actually work. ;) Also, as it > happens, I didn't want network addresses allocating, so I assumed > doing the Quantum create would be more appropriate - I hadn't realised > that both Quantum and Nova need a net record. > Yeah, makes sense. I'll add some cautionary notes to the docs in both places. Thankfully for Folsom we won't have to deal with this, as networks + subnets can be created directly via quantum. dan > > -- > Ian. > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
