Stephen, On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Stephen Gran <stephen.g...@guardian.co.uk> wrote: > Hello, > > I am investigating various high availability options for a pending > deploy of open stack. One of the obvious services to make resilient is > the mq service. We're going to be using rabbitmq, and we'll most likely > have N of them in a standard rabbit mq cluster behind a load balancer > configured as active/passive. One of the obvious improvements on this > would be to use mirrored queues to protect against message loss as well > as service downtime.
I've CC'd Major here whom I know to have tested RabbitMQ mirrored queues, and who found several consistency issues versus the ostensibly deprecated, but evidently more reliable DRBD/Pacemaker approach (http://www.rabbitmq.com/pacemaker.html). Maybe Major can pitch in some additional thoughts here. Cheers, Florian -- Need help with High Availability? http://www.hastexo.com/now _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
