Hi Dan,
Thank you so much for the reply. Instances were getting IP addresses when I
used the fake plugin (I haven't tried it with OVS plugin i think). Anyway, I
did dig into the problem. It seems that the Ryu is dropping the DHCP requests.
Here is the output that I got by ovs-ofctl snoop br-int:
================================================================
OFPT_FLOW_MOD (xid=0x463fc2e): ADD
in_port=1,dl_src=08:00:27:00:08:0e,dl_dst=01:00:5e:7f:ff:fa flags:0x1
actions=drop
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc2f): in_port=1 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b61
OFPT_ECHO_REQUEST (xid=0x0): 0 bytes of payload
OFPT_ECHO_REPLY (xid=0x0): 0 bytes of payload
OFPT_PACKET_IN (xid=0x0): total_len=90 in_port=33 data_len=90 buffer=0x00000b62
tunnel0:in_port0021:tci(0) macfa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2->33:33:00:00:00:16 type86dd
proto58 tos0 ipv6::->ff02::16 port143->0
fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2 > 33:33:00:00:00:16, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 90: :: >
ff02::16: HBH ICMP6, multicast listener report v2, 1 group record(s), length 28
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc30): in_port=33 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b62
OFPT_PACKET_IN (xid=0x0): total_len=322 in_port=33 data_len=128
buffer=0x00000b63
tunnel0:in_port0021:tci(0) macfa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2->ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff type0800
proto17 tos0 ip0.0.0.0->255.255.255.255 port68->67
fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 128:
truncated-ip - 194 bytes missing! 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
Request from fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2, length 280
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc31): in_port=33 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b63
OFPT_PACKET_IN (xid=0x0): total_len=78 in_port=33 data_len=78 buffer=0x00000b64
tunnel0:in_port0021:tci(0) macfa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2->33:33:ff:6f:5f:c2 type86dd
proto58 tos0 ipv6::->ff02::1:ff6f:5fc2 port135->0
fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2 > 33:33:ff:6f:5f:c2, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 78: :: >
ff02::1:ff6f:5fc2: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has
fe80::f816:3eff:fe6f:5fc2, length 24
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc32): in_port=33 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b64
OFPT_PACKET_IN (xid=0x0): total_len=70 in_port=33 data_len=70 buffer=0x00000b65
tunnel0:in_port0021:tci(0) macfa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2->33:33:00:00:00:02 type86dd
proto58 tos0 ipv6fe80::f816:3eff:fe6f:5fc2->ff02::2 port133->0
fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2 > 33:33:00:00:00:02, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 70:
fe80::f816:3eff:fe6f:5fc2 > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc33): in_port=33 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b65
OFPT_PACKET_IN (xid=0x0): total_len=322 in_port=33 data_len=128
buffer=0x00000b66
tunnel0:in_port0021:tci(0) macfa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2->ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff type0800
proto17 tos0 ip0.0.0.0->255.255.255.255 port68->67
fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 128:
truncated-ip - 194 bytes missing! 0.0.0.0.68 > 255.255.255.255.67: BOOTP/DHCP,
Request from fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2, length 280
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc34): in_port=33 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b66
OFPT_PACKET_IN (xid=0x0): total_len=90 in_port=33 data_len=90 buffer=0x00000b67
tunnel0:in_port0021:tci(0) macfa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2->33:33:00:00:00:16 type86dd
proto58 tos0 ipv6fe80::f816:3eff:fe6f:5fc2->ff02::16 port143->0
fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2 > 33:33:00:00:00:16, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 90:
fe80::f816:3eff:fe6f:5fc2 > ff02::16: HBH ICMP6, multicast listener report v2,
1 group record(s), length 28
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc35): in_port=33 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b67
OFPT_PACKET_IN (xid=0x0): total_len=70 in_port=33 data_len=70 buffer=0x00000b68
tunnel0:in_port0021:tci(0) macfa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2->33:33:00:00:00:02 type86dd
proto58 tos0 ipv6fe80::f816:3eff:fe6f:5fc2->ff02::2 port133->0
fa:16:3e:6f:5f:c2 > 33:33:00:00:00:02, ethertype IPv6 (0x86dd), length 70:
fe80::f816:3eff:fe6f:5fc2 > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16
OFPT_PACKET_OUT (xid=0x463fc36): in_port=33 actions_len=0 actions=drop
buffer=0x00000b68
Here is the output of brctl show br-int:
===================================================================
OFPT_FEATURES_REPLY (xid=0x1): ver:0x1, dpid:000008002716d509
n_tables:1, n_buffers:256
features: capabilities:0x87, actions:0xfff
1(eth1): addr:08:00:27:16:d5:09
config: 0
state: 0
current: 1GB-FD COPPER AUTO_NEG
advertised: 10MB-HD 10MB-FD 100MB-HD 100MB-FD 1GB-FD COPPER AUTO_NEG
supported: 10MB-HD 10MB-FD 100MB-HD 100MB-FD 1GB-FD COPPER AUTO_NEG
2(gw-f3eda887-fd): addr:fa:16:3e:28:e2:1b
config: 0
state: 0
33(tap66377ec5-bb): addr:96:3e:0d:2d:68:23
config: 0
state: 0
current: 10MB-FD COPPER
LOCAL(br-int): addr:08:00:27:16:d5:09
config: PORT_DOWN
state: LINK_DOWN
OFPT_GET_CONFIG_REPLY (xid=0x3): frags=normal miss_send_len=0
=======================================================================
and yes, I was unable to get messages on gw-* interface.
How can I resolve this problem ?
Thanks,
Salman
From: d...@nicira.com
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 14:40:58 -0700
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Instance IP assignment problem
To: salma...@live.com
CC: jorge.delac...@stackops.com; emilien.openst...@gmail.com;
openstack@lists.launchpad.net
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Salman Malik <salma...@live.com> wrote:
Hi,
Here is the error log: http://pastebin.com/KrNZDrvD
and nova.conf: http://pastebin.com/Fvd6dSZs
Emilien, I am trying to get an understanding of how different Quantum plugins
work with OpenStack. Ryu plugin is particularly interesting as it uses an
OpenFlow controller to configure Vswitches.
The problem I am faced with is (I think ) that I already have a private
network and Quantum should assign IP addresses to instances using DHCP. But
instances send out discover message on laucnh but never find a DHCP server
(although there are 2 dnsmasqs running).
I would first try this out with something like the OVS plugin (which
incidentally uses OpenFlow as wel). This is a pretty commonly used
configuration, and will help determine if the problem is in your configuration,
or the Ryu plugin in particular.
I would also try and see if dnsmasq is actually getting the request and sending
a reply. You should be able to tcpdump on the linux device that dnsmasq is
bound to (should start with gw-*). Alternately, you could look in
/var/log/syslog (i think?) to see if dnsmasq if logging that is correctly
receiving the DHCP requests.
Dan
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Salman
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 20:43:44 +0200
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Instance IP assignment problem
From: jorge.delac...@stackops.com
To: emilien.openst...@gmail.com
CC: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; salma...@live.com
Hi Emilien and Salman,
Please, could you upload all the files, errors and conf in pastebin or
something like that?
I have troubles to open in phone :)
Thank you
El 01/05/2012 20:39, "Emilien Macchi" <emilien.openst...@gmail.com> escribió:
Hi,
I have a similar problem when I create a network per project_id with Quantum.
My VMs don't get IP and I can't understand why today.
But when I create a private network for all projects, VMs get an IP and all is
working well.
Do you have the same problem ?
Salman, I'm interesting about your nova.conf. I can see you are using Ryu ?
Can you tell me more about your "use case" or architecture ?
Thanks
Le mardi 01 mai 2012 à 12:28 -0500, Salman Malik a écrit :
Hi Jorge,
Thanks for looking into the post.
I have made changes to the nova.conf file so that I only use 10.0.0.x
network (but the problem is still the same). For this configuration, I assume
that it will give out IPs to instances starting from 10.0.0.11. And just to
inform you, my eth1 is configured to be 10.0.0.10 (which is a VM itself, and
eth1 is configured as a host-only network with no DHCP) and this interface is
plugged in the integration bridge used by quantum plugins.
Thanks,
Salman
PS: Error log of a launched instance is also attached.
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 19:03:49 +0200
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Instance IP assignment problem
From: jorge.delac...@stackops.com
To: salma...@live.com
CC: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Im not really sure but you are using range for your environment 10.0.3.x
and 10.0.0.x for fixed.
Can you attach a nova network conf?
Regards
El 01/05/2012 18:56, "Salman Malik" <salma...@live.com> escribió:
Hi Guys,
Can anyone provide any insight to the following question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/nova/+question/195439
Thanks,
Salman
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
