Hello, Julien Thanks for insightful numbers!
It really seems that having 1 node per zone for Swift cluster is inefficient, and it may be better to have more not so CPU-packed storage nodes with less devices per node then few high-performance nodes with disk shelves. -- Best regards, Oleg On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Julien Danjou <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16 2012, Julien Danjou wrote: > > I'm adding a note about where the numbers come from. > > > Volumetry: > > - 450 GB of storage used (each node has 19 TB) > This has been measured with: > df -h /srv/node/c0d0p1 > > > - 57 accounts > > - 7929 containers in 7870 partitions > > - 58158 objects partitions used so far > > This is what is reported in log: > Attempted to replicate 60 dbs in 0.29485 seconds (203.49118/s) > Attempted to replicate 7930 dbs in 27.41175 seconds (289.29204/s) > 58158/58158 (100.00%) partitions replicated in 122.97s (472.95/sec, 0s > remaining) > > Regards, > -- > Julien Danjou > // eNovance http://enovance.com > // ✉ [email protected] ☎ +33 1 49 70 99 81 > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
