Does anyone else feel that the following seems really "dirty", or is it just me.
"adding a few sleep(0) calls in various places in the Nova codebase (as was recently added in the _sync_power_states() periodic task) is an easy and simple win with pretty much no ill side-effects. :)" Dirty in that it feels like there is something wrong from a design point of view. Sprinkling "sleep(0)" seems like its a band-aid on a larger problem imho. But that's just my gut feeling. :-( On 3/2/12 8:26 AM, "Armando Migliaccio" <armando.migliac...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: I knew you'd say that :P There you go: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/944145 Cheers, Armando > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] > Sent: 02 March 2012 16:22 > To: Armando Migliaccio > Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: Re: [Openstack] eventlet weirdness > > On 03/02/2012 10:52 AM, Armando Migliaccio wrote: > > I'd be cautious to say that no ill side-effects were introduced. I found a > race condition right in the middle of sync_power_states, which I assume was > exposed by "breaking" the task deliberately. > > Such a party-pooper! ;) > > Got a link to the bug report for me? > > Thanks! > -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
