> Yep, that's pretty much exactly the implementation we were hoping > might exist. If it can be built that would be phenomenal. Any > thoughts on whether that might be possible before E4 closes, or will > it have to wait until Folsom?
I'll propose a blueprint and see if I can get it approved for E4. My feeling is that it should be do-able in that timeframe. Cheers, Eoghan > > From: Eoghan Glynn [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > A-ha, I see what you mean. > > > > AFAIK that mode of upload separate to the image POST is not > > currently > > supported, but it would be quite straightforward to add say support > > for a > > header that identifies an image location for glance to retrieve > > from (as > > opposed to just recording the external location). > > > > Something like: > > > > X-Image-Meta-Retrieve-From: URI > > > > where URI is a HTTP, S3, or Swift location that's accessible to the > > glance API > > service. > > > > Would that address your use-case, Gabriel? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
