Hi guys.
Its true that we are trying to make multizones work, actually we did,
but we get into an instance were listing all vms from the parent zone (
where is has to go thru all the child zones ) is buggy ( if not
impossible by now ).
So, if there is a new zone architecture that actually works ( we want to
stop using our own deployer to do that ) or has a chance to be fully
working when 2012-1 is out, (we would prefer not to wait till Folsom) we
are totally into it ! since by now, we were actually waiting for this
new Zones code to come out to try again.
Alejandro.
On 02/01/2012 06:17 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
+1
On Feb 1, 2012 4:13 PM, "Vishvananda Ishaya" <vishvana...@gmail.com
<mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I would prefer that if it can be done super-super fast. :)
Vish
On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
> I wonder if we can use some of the architecture of the new code
and move the current implementation to that model. It'd preserve
the existing functionality, set us up for the new implementation,
and fits in with 'cleanup' for E4, etc.
>
> On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
<vishvana...@gmail.com <mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> I am all for pulling this out, but I'm a bit concerned with the
fact that we have nothing to replace it with. There are some
groups still trying to use it. MercadoLibre is trying to use it
for example. I know you guys are trying to replace this with
something better, but it would be nice not to break people for 7+
months
>>
>>
>> So I guess I have some questions:
>> 1.a) is the current implementation completely broken?
>>
>> 1.b) if yes, is it fixable
>>
>> 2) If we do remove this, what can we tell people that need
something like zones between now and the Folsom release?
>>
>> Vish
>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> As part of the new (and optional) Zones code coming down the
pipe, part of this is to remove the old Zones implementation.
>>>
>>> More info in the merge prop:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#change,3629
>>>
>>> So, can I? can I? Huh?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>>> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
<mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net>
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
<mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net>
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
<mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
