We need more than 'just' packaging.... it is using the testing, documentation and above all care to produce *and* maintain a stable release that production sites can rely on for 6-12 months and know that others are relying on it too.
Who is going to make the judgement that a bug fix to the latest Essex development branch is a valid patch for a backport to stable/diablo and does not break production sites ? Diablo 2011.3 brought much functionality but also some useful points to consider for the future as to how we organise the project. Tim > > (4) OpenStack will accept and foster a new project, one that is not > focused on development, but rather the distribution and it's general > stability. This distro project will be responsible for advocating on > behalf of various operating systems/distros/sponsoring vendors for > bugs that affect performance and stability of OpenStack, or prevent an > operating system from running OpenStack. > > Thoughts? > > d Hi We already have an little informal channel on freenode called #openstack-packaging. Regards chuck _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
